![]() ![]() Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Paragraph structure is seamless.ĥ.0 % Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. ![]() Paragraph and transition construction guide the reader. There is a sophisticated construction of paragraphs and transitions. Topic sentences and concluding remarks are appropriate to purpose. Paragraphs exhibit a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. A logical progression of ideas between paragraphs is apparent. Paragraphs are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. Some paragraphs and transitions may lack logical progression of ideas, unity, coherence, and/or cohesiveness. Transitions are inappropriate to purpose and scope. ![]() No apparent connections between paragraphs are established. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.ĥ.0 % Paragraph Development and Transitions Paragraphs and transitions consistently lack unity and coherence. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive contained within the thesis is the essence of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague purpose is not clear. The frame of reference is thorough, clear, and accurately described using research terminology.ĥ.0 % Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. The frame of reference elements are present and mostly accurate. The literature review critique is thorough and clear, and supports the purpose and research question.Ģ0.0 % Frame of Reference (qualitative) Does not mention frame of reference There are some inaccuracies describing frame of reference. The literature review and how it supports the purpose of the study are described. The literature review elements are discussed and support the purpose of the study. There are some inaccuracies describing the literature review. Research question is clearly and accurately described and is congruent with research purpose, method, and worldview of researcher.Ģ0.0 % Literature Review Does not mention literature review. The research objective, question or hypotheses are described and related to study methods. The research objective, questions or hypotheses are present and mostly accurate. There are some inaccuracies describing the research objective, questions or hypotheses. The problem and purpose of the study are clearly articulated, and their importance to nursing addressed.Ģ0.0 % Research objective, questions or hypotheses Does not mention objections, research question (s) or hypotheses. The research problem and purpose are described with reference to nursing. The research problem and purpose are present and mostly accurate. There are some inaccuracies in describing the research problem. Title Attached Documents Turnitin Report Similarity Index Final SubmissionĬlick ‘New Attempt’ to start assignment or attach documentsĢ0.0 % Research problem and purpose Does not mention research problem or purpose of study. Please Note: Assignment will not be submitted to the faculty member until the “Submit” button under “Final Submission” is clicked. You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. Refer to “Research Critique Part 1.” Questions under each heading should be addressed as a narrative, in the structure of a formal paper. The completed analysis should be 1,000-1,250 words and should connect to your identified practice problem of interest. This can be one of the selected articles from your previous literature review or a new peer-reviewed article. Prepare a critical analysis of a qualitative study focusing on the problem statement, study purpose, research question, literature review, and theoretical framework. Assignment Benchmark – Research Critique Part 1 ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |